User talk:Mairemasco

August 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hindu units of measurement, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hindu units of measurement was changed by Mairemasco (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938307 on 2011-08-20T18:43:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:44, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Mahāmrityunjaya Mantra, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. — kashmīrī ^TALK 08:35, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will find the citation. Mairemasco (talk) 08:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Just to keep in mind that such loose interpretations do not really reflect the Sanskrit original and are unlikely to stand editorial scrutiny.

Also, your statement that "Sanskrit is difficult" is based on what? Why do you think such a statement is needed in this article? Objectively, Sanskrit is not counted among difficult languages, and some editors here are proficient in it. — kashmīrī ^TALK 08:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct and I'm grateful for your editing. Sankrit of the RG Veda is difficult. This mantra is very challenging to translate. Thank you for your guidance, and I do acknowledge my addition to the entry did not meet the standards. Please be well. And I thank you. Mairemasco (talk) 09:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]